Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Jessie the lib proves Darwinism
In a conversation about taxes at Jim Wooten's Thinking Right blog, a poster named Diogenes that's a full fledged Darwiniac and unwilling to provide any proof or listen to anything that questions his/her beliefs, the subject popped up today. Then we got a surprise visit from "Jessie" who is going to unlock the mystery for us. Well probably not, but I'm going to invite him/her over to provide us with this enlightenment that escapes paleontologists, but is well known fact to a blogger. The relevant conversation begins here:
Jessie,
The comments are open and unmoderated, please tell us all about the proof that you have and no one else is privvy to.
**UPDATE** Jessie has been formally invited.
**UPDATE** Well it's been twenty four hours and there has still not been proof of any species evolving into another either here or on the blog this came from. We do have several links to the "talk origins" web site, which I highly recommend for insomniacs, but it basically says to trust them and not ask questions. It really makes you wonder why worshippers of Darwin are so petrified of questions. Frankly I'm surprised they haven't just linked to this and claimed it as proof.
By Jessie
December 20, 2006 12:53 PM | Link to this
Diogenes,
I’m going to butcher it, but there’s a famous quote that advises to never argue with an idiot. He’ll only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Your posts on public policy are great, but RW doesn’t deserve so much of your attention. Like so many Dittoheads, he’s absorbed and institutionlized (sic) the lies and no longer has the capacity for learning, thinking or growth.
Good luck.
By RW-(the original)
December 20, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this
Dio,
Maybe you should munch a few of those mushrooms.
Jim and others have said they want to stick to the subject of taxes. After this response to you I’ll get out of the way as I’ve said all I need to on topic. I know they don’t want to turn this into an evolutionary debate and frankly the liberals over at luckovich’s are far more informed on the topic than you’ll ever be, so it’s more of an intellectual challenge to debate them.
As for your latest misguided assumption, I have never said I’m opposed to Darwin being proved to me through the fossil record. Paleontologists have been trying for decades and are largely giving up on Darwin. The myth of Darwinism is primarily promoted by evolutionary biologists that need the funding to continue and anti-religious zealots like you.
As for the “beautiful monster” I bring up that IS YOUR THEORY remember? You called it punctuated equilibrium and you use to claim that the lack of proof is proof.
I hope you have the decency to allow Jim his own wishes on his own blog. I know I will and I won’t be sucked into this childish game of name calling that you can’t seem to shake.
By RW-(the original)
December 20, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this
Oh and your little dog Jessie too!
By Jessie
December 20, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this
RW (1257) “The myth of Darwinism is primarily promoted by evolutionary biologists that need the funding to continue…”
See what I mean?
Jessie,
The comments are open and unmoderated, please tell us all about the proof that you have and no one else is privvy to.
**UPDATE** Jessie has been formally invited.
**UPDATE** Well it's been twenty four hours and there has still not been proof of any species evolving into another either here or on the blog this came from. We do have several links to the "talk origins" web site, which I highly recommend for insomniacs, but it basically says to trust them and not ask questions. It really makes you wonder why worshippers of Darwin are so petrified of questions. Frankly I'm surprised they haven't just linked to this and claimed it as proof.
