Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Does President Bush believe for one second he would get this treatment?

If he does he's nuts. Let's say that, God forbid, a Democrat takes office in 2009 and a member of the Bush team gets caught stealing and destroying classified documents. There will be a call for a public execution, instead the Bush justice department is perfectly happy to let Sandy Berger off with a slap on the wrist.

“My staff’s investigation reveals that President Clinton’s former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger compromised national security much more than originally disclosed,” Davis said. “It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for his own convenience.

“The 9/11 Commission relied on incomplete and misleading information regarding its access to documents Mr. Berger reviewed. No one ever told the Commission that Mr. Berger had access to original documents that he could have taken without detection.

“We now know that Mr. Berger left stolen highly classified documents at a construction site to avoid detection. We know that Mr. Berger insisted on privacy at times to allow him to conceal documents that he stole. One witness with a very high security clearance believed he saw Berger concealing documents in his socks.

One of the worst parts of this is that we don't have the first clue what was really taken and destroyed and it's hard to find the government's eye witness very credible.

“The Justice Department’s assertion that Mr. Berger’s statements are credible after being caught is misplaced. One wouldn’t rely on the fox to be truthful after being nabbed in the hen house. But the Justice Department apparently did.”





Buy Danish,

Did you notice that Professor Pecker Stalker doesn't know the difference between your and you're?

I have more against the fact that your unemployed and a drain on society than I do that you’re old. I just know that pointing out your advanced age gets to you.

I guess it would have been too much to expect for him to get it right three times in one paragraph.
Well I'll just have to check out the MSM to see if there's been any coverage on this selective finding.


The Spanker likes to comment on Buy Danish's weight, age, and personal choices. Hell, he threw me in there with Danish yesterday, the other day (I can't remember).

It's something only a "catty female would resort to."

Did anyone here get an e-mail from that "freedomform.com" somebody keeps posting at ml's and Wooten's. Just got it today, but never linked to the site. Curious.

I sent you an e-mail RW.
Make that "freedomforum.com".

I got your email and as usual I don't have the first clue what the subject line means. That's pretty weird that you would get an email from that site. I took a look at it and it's only got a few post and about five total comments on the whole site. Mr. "freedom" only allows registered comments and the latest post says Bush tried to sell our ports, so it's got no traffic or any concern for being factual.

Freedomforum? That's not the site that Midori invited you to join is it?

Was there an attachment with my e-mail? A funny audio of an angry preacher?

Hurry up an answer. It's my bedtime.
And make that "an" an "and".

The video was there and very entertaining, but it didn't explain the subject line. There was also a notepad attachment that might have explained it, but it was blank.

This freedomforum is a start-up blogspot blog. It looks like it's first post was mid December and it isn't the one Midori was talking about. Goodnight!
Subject line - Accusations against Christians at ml's. We never claim perfection, but they seem to think we do.

G'nite RW. No need to respond. I won't hear you.

Uh Oh! Now they're going to think you're LuckoDull.


YOU'RE a great eagle-eyed blog-reader to notice Professor Pecker Stalker's error, and I appreciate YOUR posting it at YOUR site.

Why TF was he talking about Inherit the Wind to me? I don't recall discussing the subject with him.

Oh, I remember! I posted something to his butt buddy, Huge GasBag, about what a crock it is. Pecker Stalker must have picked it up in their pillow talk.


We don't call him "Stalker Boy" for nothing.
Buy Danish,

YOU'RE welcome! He also said Inherit the Wind was drama. I've only seen the 1960 version and it's pure comedy. I thought YOUR link had been to Summer For the Gods though.

My link was to Summer of the Gods AFTER Huge GasBag gloatingly brought up Inherit the Wind and implied that is was an accurate account of history.

I appreciate YOUR link to the latest chapter in the Sandy Burglar story since they teased the story during H&C, but never got around to discussing it since they were so busy with the important news about Trump's snarky letter to Rosie the Riveter.

Speaking of SB, I can't believe that the idiot House voted to put that 9/11 commission cargo screening thing through. I hope Bush vetoes it. Can you imagine the effect it would have on transportation running smoothly? As my kid said - "What do they care? They probably ride around in private jets and don't have to go through security lines and luggage/cargo checks like we do".

Plus I think they are going to try to do anything they can to sink the economy and blame it on Bush.
Attention Spanker Wanker Pecker Stalker,


That's Summer FOR the Gods.
Buy Danish,

All of the cargo is already fully inspected on the shipping end and screened here. This may well pass through because it's easy to make it sound like a good idea, but the negative consequences will be enormous.

What happened to the liberal line about a little terror being the cost of freedom?

The few Democrats that are smart enough to know what a ridiculous and worthless piece of feel good legislation this is are probably supporting it just to hurt WalMart.

Maybe we can solve two problems and get Mexico to manufacture all the things we get from China and tell all the illegal immigrants that the jobs are all down there.
This is the sort of English up with which I will not put!

Additional correction from my 7:01 at MLs today:

Among other false premises and you think that military service. The word "and" should have been a comma.

My 11:31 was meant for Professor Pecker Stalker, but I'm sure you know that.

You're absolutely right about the cargo inspections taking place at the point of origin. I also bet that the Longshoreman's Union that will benefit somehow. It's really not that hard to explain and Bush should fight this one tooth and nail.

Hey, I just realized I never found out what happened at the Port of Miami when they found C4 by a cruise ship the day after the surveillance run by the poor, misunderstood Iraqi truck driver.

Anyway, won't all these inspections make us SLAVES like Brainless and his soul mate were whining about?

I like your idea about moving the business that goes to China to Mexico. Quite brilliant actually!

On that note - Goodnight!
Goodnight BD!
Excuse me RW, I need to leave a message for the Ornery Vagina. I thought I had hit the post in time to clear the cut-off, but it didn't make it.


Wooten's was up to 250 comments today. What point were you trying to make at ml's with the 160?

I'm leaving this message here because it's a well-known fact that you stalk this site 24/7. Who has the addiction problem again?

I said that I had grown tired of listening to the same old tired repetitive droning at ml's.

You would call it getting bored.

But then you would know all about getting bored wouldn't you. You'd enjoy it regardless of who or what was yapping endlessly.

I also got screwed by the curfew. I apologize in advance for the lengthy and off-topic post -

Just in case Rushncap is watching, I need to address this comment -

Muffin, feeling a bit jealous that Paul is ignoring your rants? Don’t worry, honey, consider it good practice. Your kids will do that soon too, once they reach an age where they start reasoning for themselves.

PAUL?? You're the one who was yakking with him all day, not me r2rushncap2.


We know the mentally ill Dr. Pecker Stalker lurks here, so I'll address this fantasy:

By Onastic Vermin

January 10, 2007 07:10 PM


Is that why are unemployed, because you were fired for gross incompetence? Please forgive me if I ignore the critique of an aging, unemployed, blog-addicted housewife who does nothing but habitually prove that she is divorced from reality. Considering that your beliefs are the ones that most closely resemble the Islamic extremists, it would appear you and your ilk are the ones most likely to be donning suicide vests. Seen the movie “Jesus Camp”? That’s you, Granny.

Scum Producer,

1. I am not "unemployed" and never have been. I worked for more years than your sick little flabby ass has yet seen on this planet, and I ended my career voluntarily because I wanted to be with my son and not dump him in day care, and I do not regret my decision.

2. We're all "aging", moron.

3. I do what I do because I can and because I enjoy it. How tragic for you that you're a miserable fuck.

4. My beliefs have nothing to do with Islamic moderates, never mind Islamic extremists. You however, are a Useful Idiot who enables them to operate.

5. No, I haven't seen your movie. I've never been to a camp of any sort in my life, and I'm not about to start now. I'm not an evangelical Christian either, not that it's any of your effing business. The only person I "know" of who is one, is Fred Barnes, and he seems like a very normal person to me (not like you freak).

6. No Christians, of any denomination, are donning suicide vests, either literally or figuratively, and blowing up themselves and their infant children.

My reference to "suicide" bombers had nothing to do with the religion of MLs Red Diaper Babies and everything to do with the suicidal course they and you would lead us on as a nation. In other words, it was a metaphor for self-destructive defeat.

In short, poor Professor Pecker Stalker, you know nothing about anything because you are nothing.

Now that I've gotten that^^off my chest, here's my post speech comment -

I certainly hope that this is not just a bunch of hot air. This is the key to the whole situation. I'd like to see a deadline. Like tomorrow.
Buy Danish,

Maliki made that statement publicly this afternoon and President Bush made it clear in his speech that the old restrictions would be gone so I think behind the scenes somebody is cracking the whip. It's about damn time.
Well Buy Danish, I heard several subtle references in Bush's speech that indicated just that.

A change in the rules of engagement regardless of tribal sect or political affiliation. I took that to mean Sadr and Sadr City.

Preceding the speech, someone mentioned that Maliki had told Bush "I promise you by God, Sadr will not run Iraq."

I also appreciate the warships sitting in the Persian Gulf, Israels slip of the tongue on its' nukes.

Rudy just mentioned that it was only a month ago that the Democrats were saying that we needed to send more troops. I was thinking that I heard that but couldn't be sure.

Wesley Clarke sounded like an incompetent with political aspirations. Negotiate, my ass.

Somebody must be trying to pull a rhetorical fast one. Several times today I've heard that we have supposedly been in Iraq longer than we fought World War II and now Tom Vilsack (D-Iowa) that wants to be President just said that we have been in Iraq for 5 1/2 years and have lost 3000 soldiers so it's time for Iraq to take over.

I thought it could have been a slip up, but he did it again. So now they think Americans are stupid enough to believe we've been in Iraq since before 9/11.

This guy also said we should get out of all of Iraq except the north. They don't even need us in the north. Did I mention this guy thinks he should be President?
Goodnight @@!
I really wish I hadn't followed that last incomplete sentence with a G'nite.

Oh well, I don't know how to fix it without deleting the whole thing so it stands.

Hey, I'm planning on staying up all night....watching T.V.

Rudy did say exactly that. Wesley Clark is Darth Vader, not Cheney.



It's about time is right. I heard just a snippet of Rick Santorum on Laura Ingraham yesterday, and I'm not completely sure of the context, but he was complaining that Karen Hughes' appease the Islamists policy is a disaster. I don't know if coddling Maliki falls into that scenario or her purview, but I'm sick of appeasing every damned one of them.

My jaw dropped when I heard that campaign speech from Vilsack too. Maybe he has hired the new House Intelligence Committee chairman, Fernando (?) Reyes to be his foreign policy advisor.

btw, I heard Romney on the radio yesterday and read a great bit about him by David Frum today. I think he's my man.
Buy Danish,

I've had Romney at the top of my list for a long time. Every time I go to Massachusetts the moonbats snarl and say he's got his head up his ass, so I feel a lot better about him not being a New England RINO.

How about following Vilsack's idiocy and refusal to answer any straight forward questions with Ollie North?

It was one of those "answer the freaking question" moments, that's for sure.

I love Rudi being a New Yawker and all, and I think he'd be great in the cabinet. I also think Newt is brilliant but unelectable.


Speaking of Wesley Clark.

I was at a party over Christmas vacation and an ex-State Department guy was there. I was appalled. It was all about the Jews running the country, and Pat Robertson blah blah blah. He also complained very snootily about how inarticulate the hosts are on Fox 'n' Friends, and he seemed to really have a thing about Alison Camerota.

This is a very scary situation if you think about it. These are the "elites" in our government, in academia, in the MSM and they'd dump Israel in a New York minute if they could (pun intended).
Hannity crying to Elizabeth Hasselback about how he has to put up with Alan Colmes every day is a little much.

Memo to Hannity: You go on camera facing off against a guy that's such a wuss even the Dems hate him. She goes 3 against 1 with a live rabid moonbat audience every day and she's not whining. Grow a pair Sean.

I usually like Sean, but every once in a while...ugh.

He's on Trump's bandwagon right now (maybe he's being told to do that by his producers?) and while I'd choose him over Rosie, I think that fact that he went public with a private conversation with Barbara Walters was a huge faux pas and he's going to pay the price for that. No one is mentioning that, which I find bizarre. He painted Barbara Walters into a corner - what's she supposed to do? It's so ridiculous.

Not to mention the fact that all of Trump's personal attacks about how ugly she is and her poor girlfriend are really juvenile.
Buy Danish,

Between Trump, Rosie, and Babawaa Waawaa, it's awfully tough to pick a right or likable side. I'm giving it the train wreck treatment.

I agree, and don't understand why SH is putting himself in the middle of this cat fight.
Buy Danish,

As much as he might think he's an outsider, and in many ways he is, he's still in that Manhattan media bubble where everybody is way more fascinated with this than the rest of us.
Gosh I'm so glad you guys have Romney up there.

I feel validated.

There have been several articles on his abortion flip-flop. Some put forth by the left-wing.

I read one article that implied it was their attempt to discredit. Then again, some evangelicals are putting it out there.

My personal opinion is that sometimes the evangelicals overplay their hand...Robertson, Falwell, etc..
O.K., I'm reading quite a few articles on a debate held between Kennedy & Romney.

Alot of political double-speak from Romney on the abortion issue, but alot of ability to influence, through legalities, activist judges.

Check out this guy.

Who is Jim Gilmore?

Here's that Hot Air Romney link that I screwed up somehow -

Romney on abortion.

I don't have a problem with someone who says they became more conservative as they matured. That makes perfect sense to me.


I agree with you about the CR overplaying their hand. Look at Wooten and his stupid position on Sunday Liquor sales. I'm don't know what his religious denomination is, but he is clearly letting his narrow personal religious views overwhelm his "conservative" ideology to the point of absurdity.
Watched the video Danish.

On the abortion issue he seemed pretty grounded. Change of heart, kinda like mine. No expansion on the Roe v Wade. Rights go to individual states. I'm in favor.

Boy Scouts? He seemed to have confidence that the Scouts can hold their own in a court of law.

Sounds like a fence straddler, but protective and confident in the law.

I'll keep him up there.

Would anybody here like to tell me what the hell has happened at the blogs today?

I've withdrawn myself from Wooten's. Usually only made one comment there anyway, but the namejacking confuses people so maybe if I depart, that'll be one less confusion.

Probably not, but it wasn't that important anyway.
Oops! this popped up at Wooten's, but nobody had even mentioned Carter:

By harold

January 11, 2007 04:35 PM | Link to this

so, 14 Carter advisers were Jewish, eh…

they are making themselves a laughingstock. “OH, somebody criticized Isreal; he is antisemite although that goes against everyhing the man has ever been but neveryoumind about that”

You could see the explosion coming yesterday before the speech over at ml's.

I expected the same at Wooten's but I don't have any idea what happened over there. He wants you back though. Was that your post about Scooter at ml's?

What do you mean about the harold comment?

Yes that was my post about Scooter. Why would a liberal namejacker post something nice about Scooter?

I've known Scooter since school. Very smart, very easy going. Very libertarian when it comes to government, but realistic when it comes to this war and the enemy.

Like I said, I don't have the need to post at Wooten's. I used to enjoy reading over there sometimes, but it's pretty much become the same zoo.

Wooten won't miss me. He can have PoliFore.
I'm sorry RW. Forgot about the "harold" comment. That was posted at Wooten's while ml's was becoming unhinged.

"harold" sounds a lot like PoliFore to me.

Nobody had even commented on Jimmy Carter at Wooten's.

Next time you see an explosion coming, tell me to suit up. I got fragged. I'm wiping the spittle off the screen now.

I didn't think it sounded like a jacking, but I had no idea you knew Scooter either.

Harold would say, "Harold thinks you don't know Harold."

Somebody made a remark late yesterday about all the third person comments. I think Harold and Dio are about the only ones that do that, but they hadn't been there I don't think, so the complaint seemed strange.

After watching BigDaddy master the art of talking in the third person nobody else should ever try it. He's the only person I've ever seen make that work.
I know I'm downstairs RW, but maybe you'll join me. If not, WTH.

We both caught N-GA nickjacking, namejacking, jacking off, whatever.

Jimmy Carter comment by harold 4:35 @ Wooten's before anyone even said anything about Carter.

JC comment by LuckoDull 5:05 @ ml's.

JC comment by N-GA 5:29 @ ml's.

Strange people. Feel like I'm in the middle of a train wreck where all trains converge.

Hey mister RW. I've done the third person thing in some of my comments. I'll stop on your advice though. (Winkin' Blinkin' & Noddin')

Maybe you have it perfected too then since I hadn't noticed. It's usually quite obnoxious and it didn't help Bob Dole any.

If that last comment is goodnight, Goodnight! You should watch the video at the bottom of the upstairs post first.

I don't think NGA was the nickjacker, it was PoFo.

I don't get your point about the Carter comments. The story was all over Drudge, and I almost posted it myself.

But...I think I had a similar thought about Harold being PoFo, although it wasn't from that post. I will be on the alert.


That third person comment on the blog was bizarre.
Buy Danish,

I see you didn't trust yourself with the placement of the racist hyphen either. Maybe those losers will use your suspicion is proof and claim I have to leave the blog.

The comment sounded very Pollyish, but the goat sure ran off fast and the only times he does that is when he's been caught in one of these shenanigans.

Good point. Maybe it was NGA!

We could let those Iranians go in 444 days.

Buy Danish,

It was crazed rage day at the AJC blogs so who knows what was what. Just think, in a few short hours we'll hear the same cackling chorus. I hope they have a few new talking points.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?